<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/02/21/qualcomm-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/02/21/qualcomm-revisited/</link>
	<description>thoughts about the evolution of e-discovery</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E-Discovery, Legal Discovery, Electronic Discovery, Electronic Data Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/02/21/qualcomm-revisited/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E-Discovery, Legal Discovery, Electronic Discovery, Electronic Data Discovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=49#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>[...] As for my friends who do happen to be lawyers, they focused on the Qualcomm case, pointing out (as we have written before) that the problem was not technology, but rather poor processes and bad judgment on the part of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As for my friends who do happen to be lawyers, they focused on the Qualcomm case, pointing out (as we have written before) that the problem was not technology, but rather poor processes and bad judgment on the part of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
