<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concept Search Versus Keyword Search in Electronic Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/12/concept-search-versus-keyword-search-in-electronic-discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/12/concept-search-versus-keyword-search-in-electronic-discovery/</link>
	<description>thoughts about the evolution of e-discovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Elite Review</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/12/concept-search-versus-keyword-search-in-electronic-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Elite Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=228#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SEO Elite Review...&lt;/strong&gt;

It is good to see posts that give truly quality information. Great post. :)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SEO Elite Review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It is good to see posts that give truly quality information. Great post. <img src='http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Uppington</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/12/concept-search-versus-keyword-search-in-electronic-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Uppington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=228#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Thanks Clint!  I agree that categorizing documents for review is a very common usage of content categorization/clustering technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Clint!  I agree that categorizing documents for review is a very common usage of content categorization/clustering technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleffingwell</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/12/concept-search-versus-keyword-search-in-electronic-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>cleffingwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=228#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Great article, Will; and I think you are spot on!  Having a background in content management (part of which includes categorization), I completely agree that what is applicable in enterprise search is not necessarily applicable in e-discovery.   think that many e-discovery participants mistakenly take the approach of using concept search and/or categorization to rule data into or out of the Review process.  However based on my observations, I think that concepts or categories are best used to organize data into batches for review.  When it comes to email, many attorneys seem to prefer to review them in batches based upon conversation or topic; whereas, they might also prefer to review documents based upon subject matter, category, concept, or some other logical demarcation.  Like you summarized at the end, concept/category search is not mutually exclusive to keyword searching; but rather is complementary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Will; and I think you are spot on!  Having a background in content management (part of which includes categorization), I completely agree that what is applicable in enterprise search is not necessarily applicable in e-discovery.   think that many e-discovery participants mistakenly take the approach of using concept search and/or categorization to rule data into or out of the Review process.  However based on my observations, I think that concepts or categories are best used to organize data into batches for review.  When it comes to email, many attorneys seem to prefer to review them in batches based upon conversation or topic; whereas, they might also prefer to review documents based upon subject matter, category, concept, or some other logical demarcation.  Like you summarized at the end, concept/category search is not mutually exclusive to keyword searching; but rather is complementary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
