<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sedona Cooperation Proclamation and the Case for Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/17/the-sedona-cooperation-proclamation-and-the-case-for-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/17/the-sedona-cooperation-proclamation-and-the-case-for-collaboration/</link>
	<description>thoughts about the evolution of e-discovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cooperation Isn&#8217;t Just About Search Protocols &#171; docNative Paradigm Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/17/the-sedona-cooperation-proclamation-and-the-case-for-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooperation Isn&#8217;t Just About Search Protocols &#171; docNative Paradigm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=247#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>[...] More recently, in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collins &amp; Aikman Corp., 2009 WL 94311 (S.D.N.Y., Jan. 13, 2009) Judge Schira Scheindlin found that the SEC’s “blanket refusal to negotiate a workable search protocol” was “patently unreasonable” citing both Mancia and the Sedona Conference’s Cooperation Proclamation: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More recently, in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collins &amp; Aikman Corp., 2009 WL 94311 (S.D.N.Y., Jan. 13, 2009) Judge Schira Scheindlin found that the SEC’s “blanket refusal to negotiate a workable search protocol” was “patently unreasonable” citing both Mancia and the Sedona Conference’s Cooperation Proclamation: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/17/the-sedona-cooperation-proclamation-and-the-case-for-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=247#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>[...] appreciated by counsel on both sides of the &#8220;v.&#8221;  Until notions of proportionality and cooperation start becoming common parlance for both litigators and judges we will unfortunately continue to see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appreciated by counsel on both sides of the &#8220;v.&#8221;  Until notions of proportionality and cooperation start becoming common parlance for both litigators and judges we will unfortunately continue to see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; e-discovery, electronic discovery, legal discovery, ediscovery, EDD</title>
		<link>http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/2008/11/17/the-sedona-cooperation-proclamation-and-the-case-for-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; e-discovery, electronic discovery, legal discovery, ediscovery, EDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/?p=247#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>[...] Next, Judge Scheindlin addressed the SEC&#8217;s decision to &#8220;unilaterally&#8221; limit its search to &#8220;centralized compilations&#8221; which ultimately &#8220;turned up nothing.&#8221;  She found that the SEC&#8217;s &#8220;blanket refusal to negotiate a workable search protocol&#8221; was &#8220;patently unreasonable&#8221; citing both Mancia and the Sedona Conference&#8217;s Cooperation Proclamation: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next, Judge Scheindlin addressed the SEC&#8217;s decision to &#8220;unilaterally&#8221; limit its search to &#8220;centralized compilations&#8221; which ultimately &#8220;turned up nothing.&#8221;  She found that the SEC&#8217;s &#8220;blanket refusal to negotiate a workable search protocol&#8221; was &#8220;patently unreasonable&#8221; citing both Mancia and the Sedona Conference&#8217;s Cooperation Proclamation: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
