Comments on: Manual Collections of ESI in Electronic Discovery Come under Fire

By: Self Collections in E-Discovery – Just too Risky for Prime Time | e-discovery 2.0

Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:01:57 +0000

[...] past blogs I’ve discussed a number of cases that have expressed skepticism over the self collection of [...]

By: “Conscious Indifference” to Legal Hold Duty Equals “Bad Faith” Finding and Terminating Sanctions in Phillips Case | Electronic Discovery Insider

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:37:11 +0000

[...] is going to utilize a manual, custodian based litigation hold process it needs to recognize the risks. This isn’t to say that this type of approach won’t work, but an unsupervised process (via [...]

By: “Conscious Indifference” to Legal Hold Duty Equals “Bad Faith” Finding and Terminating Sanctions in Phillips Case | e-discovery 2.0

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:06:05 +0000

By: Fulbright Litigation Survey Calls Out Need for More Proportionality/Rules Changes | e-discovery 2.0

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:23:54 +0000

[...] information.” Custodian based collections have been discussed recently as being under fire in blogs and other recent cases such as Pension Committee and Ford Motor Co. v. Edgewood Properties Inc. The [...]

By: Automated Collection: Mitgating the Risks and Costs of Manual Collection

Automated Collection: Mitgating the Risks and Costs of Manual Collection — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:23:50 +0000

[...] Gonsowski responded to Jason’s call in an article titled “Manual Collections of ESI in Electronic Discovery Come under Fire:” in which he writes: there’s no dispute that the “automated” collection methods [...]